by Professor Theophilus A. Benson
Recent studies show that, in developing regions (e.g. Africa and Southeast Asia), fast internet connectivity lifted approximately 2.5 million people out of extreme poverty  and techniques to improve web performance (e.g. Google’s AMP) improved profit by 20% . Given these studies, it is unsurprising that significant work and effort have gone into improving connectivity in these regions. These efforts range from improving the mobile networks (from 2G to 4G and now 5G) and improving networking infrastructure to reducing the cost of mobile data rates and increasing the amount of local language content. Although these efforts offer tremendous benefits, a significant piece of the connectivity puzzle remains overlooked – namely, the user’s mobile devices.
Although recent studies show that users in developing regions often have multiple phones, our analysis  of a large-scale social network demonstrates that these phones are most often low-end phones with low CPU and memory. Moreover, our study showed that over the last five years, while the hardware characteristics of mobile devices in developed regions increased by a factor of 2X-3X, devices in developed regions remain largely stagnant. We note that this stagnation is naturally at the averages; the top 1% of these developing regions experienced increased growth.
A consequence of these dominant low-end phones is that the improvements to connectivity and network interconnects has yielded limited benefits. This problem is akin to improving highways and eliminating congestion – these efforts will significantly benefit cars and trucks but provide minimal benefits to cyclists and pedestrians. To illustrate, in the Figure below, we demonstrate the impact of various network connectivity speeds on a high-end (LG G5 with 4GB of RAM and 2x2.15, 2x1.6 GHz CPU) and a low-end (QMobile Q Infinity B with 1GB RAM and Quad-core 4x1.2 GHz CPU) phone. These results show that improving network performance has a ~10X impact on web performance on the high-end phone, whereas, on the low-end phones, improved network performance yields limited web performance (only 3X). The muted impact of better network performance on low-end phones motivates the need for more mobile device-specific optimizations.
As a first step towards developing such optimizations, my group and I have been designing a variety of data-driven methods to dissect, characterize and understand mobile performance:
More recently, we also analyzed emerging web protocols, e.g. HTTP/3 and QUIC, to understand their role in addressing this problem . We observe that these protocols compound the problem. On the one hand, their designs consume significantly more CPU resources which is challenging for low-end phones. On the other hand, our study showed that optimizing these protocols, in practice, can be difficult and time-consuming considering the overhead of dealing with the new edge cases introduced by them and the overhead of implementing congestion control algorithms from scratch.
For more information, click the link that follows to contact Brown CS Communication and Outreach Specialist Jesse C. Polhemus.